Sequential free fibula transfers: Quality of life and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Successive osteoseptocutaneous fibula transfers for jaws reconstruction are rare but important options. This study contributes patient-reported and clinical outcomes, as well as systematically reviews all existing reports. METHODS: All sequential fibula transfers performed by the senior author were reviewed from a prospectively managed database, including University of Washington quality of life (UWQoL). Systematic review was conducted in PubMed and Cochrane databases for similar publications. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (average age 51.5 years) received sequential fibulas (mean 4.7 years between reconstructions). Secondary fibulas more often had benign indications (72.2% vs. 33.3%, p = .04), most commonly osteoradionecrosis (38.9%). At a mean follow-up of 30.5 months, the average interincisal distance increased from 21.8 to 27.6 mm, and 92.3% tolerated an oral diet following the second fibula. Eight patients completed the UW-QoL before and after the second fibula, and three prior to the first fibula. Composite physical function was significantly decreased from 96.7 prefibula reconstruction to 63.3 following the first (p < .001) and 64.2 after the second fibula (p < .001). There were no differences in other domains. The systematic review yielded six articles reporting 56 patients (mean 39 months between fibulas). Secondary fibulas were performed for repeat malignancy (45%) and osteoreadionecrosis (39%), resulting in elevated tube feeding from 20% following the first to 39% following the second, but overall high quality of life in two studies. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential osteoseptocutaneous fibula reconstructions of jaws are often performed for benign indications such as osteoradionecrosis. Overall function and QoL are comparable with those following the first fibula transfer.

Microsurgical reconstruction for head and neck in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing dialysis.

INTRODUCTION: Free flap transfer for head and neck defects has gained worldwide acceptance. Because flap failure is a devastating outcome, studies have attempted to identify risk factors-including renal failure. We sought to determine whether end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing dialysis are at increased risk of flap failure following microsurgical head and neck reconstruction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study's participants were patients who underwent free flap reconstruction in the head and neck region at Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital between January 2010 and December 2019. We used the National Health Insurance "Specific Diagnosis and Treatment Code" to identify patients undergoing dialysis; these patients comprised the dialysis group, whose members were matched to a non-dialysis group for age and gender. The dependent variables were flap survival rate, take-back rate, and flap failure risk between the dialysis and non-dialysis groups. RESULTS: We included 154 patients in the dialysis (n = 14) and non-dialysis (n = 140) groups. The groups were similar in terms of age and most comorbidities, except diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary artery disease, which were more prevalent in the dialysis group. The dialysis and non-dialysis groups had similar flap survival rates (100% vs. 92.9%; p = .600). Twenty-three patients underwent take-back surgery, most in the non-dialysis group (14.3% vs. 15.0%; p = 1.000). Patients in the dialysis group were more likely to have prolonged intensive care unit stays; however, dialysis alone did not predict flap failure (OR: 0.83; p = .864). CONCLUSION: This study found no significant differences in free flap survival and take-back rates between patients with and without dialysis. Dialysis did not increase the risk of flap failure following microsurgical head and neck reconstruction in this study; however, prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed.

Surgical Treatment of Breast Lymphedema: A Distinct Pathology With Unique Challenges.

BACKGROUND: Supermicrosurgical advances such as lymphovenous bypass (LVB) have enabled effective physiologic treatment of lymphedema affecting the extremities. Reports of surgical treatment for breast lymphedema (BL) are sparse, consisting of case reports and almost exclusively LVB. We report our experience with BL, including a case of mastectomy and breast reconstruction with abdominal free flap and inguinal vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) for BL. We compare our series with the surgical literature to discern unique characteristics and treatment limitations inherent to this disease. METHODS: A database was prospectively maintained from September 2020 to May 2023 including all patients diagnosed with BL who were referred to our institution. Breast lymphedema was diagnosed using clinical criteria, and relevant patient data were recorded. Patients interested in surgical management underwent indocyanine green lymphography to determine candidacy for LVB or other interventions. All patients, including those surgically managed, were treated with complex decongestive therapy. RESULTS: Nine patients with BL were included. Eight had undergone breast-conserving therapy for breast cancer with whole breast irradiation. One patient was treated for Hodgkin lymphoma with axillary lymphadenectomy and axillary radiation. Indocyanine green lymphography was performed in 6 patients, of which 4 patients had diffuse dermal backflow. Two patients had lymphatic targets suitable for LVB, including the patient without breast irradiation. Three patients were managed surgically. One patient without bypass targets underwent breast reduction with partial symptomatic relief, later followed by a mastectomy with abdominal free flap reconstruction and VLNT. Two patients with suitable bypass targets underwent LVB, with resolution of breast swelling and subjective symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The diffuse lymphatic obliteration due to radiation field effect in BL results in a distinct pathophysiology compared with extremity lymphedema. Although published reports of surgical BL treatment almost exclusively describe LVB, other surgical options may be more frequently required. Ablative strategies such as mastectomy and regenerative techniques such as VLNT should be considered potential first-line treatment options for these patients.

Application of extended ulnar parametacarpal perforator free flap for the reconstruction of total pulp defect of the thumb: A case report.

Many procedures are available for the coverage of thumb pulp defects; however, to gain thumb function and esthetics, a similar tissue is desirable. If the length of the longitudinal defect is <2 cm, a volar advancement flap is appropriate; however, if the flap is >2 cm long or wider, retrograde or free flaps are required. Here, we present a case of thumb pulp reconstruction using an extended ulnar parametacarpal perforator (UPM) flap, which achieved excellent functional and esthetic outcomes. A 46-year-old man underwent reconstruction surgery of his thumb, which was a degloved total pulp. A sensate 5.2 × 3.2 cm UPM flap was designed on the ulnar side of the right palm and transferred to his thumb. The flap donor site was covered with a V-Y advancement flap on the dorsal side of the right hand. At 12 months postoperatively, the patient achieved a functional and natural thumb appearance with high satisfaction. The UPM flap can offer soft tissue similar to the pulp region in the digit without a palm scar at the donor site. This extended application is suitable for the reconstruction of a total pulp defect of the digit and is an alternative option for a hemi-pulp flap from the toe area.

Syndactylized glabrous flaps for multiple finger palmar defects.

BACKGROUND: Palmar finger or pulp defects require coverage with glabrous tissue to achieve a good match with the lost tissue. The management of multiple finger palmar or pulp defects is challenging because these defects may not always be suitable for local or pedicled flaps. In such situations, syndactylizing free or pedicled flaps can be used. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the results of free glabrous flaps syndactylizing across multiple finger defects. The two flaps used were the superficial branch of the radial artery (SUPBRA) flap and hypothenar free flap. Seven syndactylized glabrous free flaps were used to cover the defects in 16 fingers. The functional results and complaints were also assessed. RESULTS: Mean flap size was 14.35 cm2. Six flaps survived. Postoperative evaluation data were obtained for the 13 fingers. All the patients returned to their previous work. All patients had a diminished protective sensation of at least 4.31 according to the SWM test. The mean two-point discrimination score of the patients was 9.9 mm (7-14). One finger had a PIP joint flexion contracture of 30°, no donor-site complaints were observed. CONCLUSION: The advantages of these flaps include single operation site, strong glabrous tissue coverage, low risk of flexion contracture, and adequate tissue size for large defects. Disadvantages include two-stage and complex microsurgical operations, prolonged treatment, and hospital stay.

The use of vascularized fibula flap with allograft in post-oncologic microsurgical bone reconstruction of lower limbs in pediatric patients.

BACKGROUND: Post-oncologic surgical reconstruction of lower limbs in pediatrics remains a challenging topic. Microsurgical techniques allow reconstructions of large bony defects. The use of vascularized fibular flap with allograft has proven to be an ideal biologic construct. We aim to assess the success rate of this operation, including flap survival, bony union, weight-bearing ambulation, and complications in a long-term follow-up in our case series compared to the literature. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Our case-series includes 18 femoral resections (9 osteosarcomas, 8 Ewing sarcoma, and 1 desmoid tumor) and 15 tibial resections (10 osteosarcoma, 4 Ewing sarcoma, and 1 Malignant Fibrous Histiocytoma). We collected patients' demographics, type of tumor, type of resection, defect size, fibula-flap length, method of fixation, anastomosis site, follow-up data, complications, and their management. All survivals were examined by X-ray and CT-scan to evaluate the morphological changes of the vascularized fibula and follow-up. The functional evaluation was performed by the 30-point Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Rating Score (MSTS) for the lower limb (Enneking et al., Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1993(286):241-246). RESULTS: The mean age of the femur resection patients' group was 11.2 years with a mean defect size of 14 cm and a mean length of the fibular flap of 18 cm; for the tibia the mean age was 12 years with a mean defect size of 14 cm and a mean length of the fibular flap of 16.6 cm. The overall survival of the reconstructions at 5 years follow-up was 17 out 18 cases for the femur and 13 out of 15 cases for the tibia. MSTS score was 28.2 for the femur and 23.7 for the tibia. The average time of union of the fibula was seen after 5 months, while allograft consolidation was observed around 19.7 months. The mean time of follow-up was 144.5 months for the femur and 139.2 months for the tibia. The complication rate observed was 7 out of 18 for the femur and 7 out of 15 for the tibia reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS: The viability of the fibula is a cornerstone in the success of reconstruction as well as the successful management of complications in intercalary defects after tumor resection in pediatrics to restore good functionality. Our results are in line with those reported in the literature in terms of overall complication rates. The high primary union of allograft, the high MSTS score obtained, and the low rate of severe complications reflect the mechanical role of this reconstructive technique over a long follow-up.

Reconstruction of Multiple Lip and Facial Defects With Bipaddle and Sensate Radial Forearm Free Flap.

ABSTRACT: Free flaps and their modifications are used to reconstruct multiple large defects in the lip and face. In this study, we present our results on the reconstruction of these defects using bipaddle and sensate free radial forearm-palmaris longus flaps and subsequent revision surgeries. Patient medical records of 11 patients with a mean age of 63.9 ± 12.8 years were retrospectively reviewed. Functional oral competence, lip cosmetics, lip sensation, and donor forearm scars were evaluated using the drooling rating scale, visual analog scale, Semmes Weinstein Monofilament test, and patient and observer scar assessment scale, respectively. The mean dimensions of distal and proximal skin paddles of bipaddle free radial forearm-palmaris longus flaps were 12.7 ± 9.9 and 20.5 ± 3.8 cm2. Mean lengths of the bridge and proximal pedicles were 4.7 ± 1.6 and 5.5 ± 0.7 cm. All the flaps survived. No drooling was observed in the 2 patients without lower lip defects. The mean drooling scores of the 9 patients with lower lip defects were statistically different (Analysis of Variance, pANOVA < 0.00001) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively. The differences between 3 and 12 months were the most significant (pANOVA < 0.00001, pTUKEY < 0.000001). The lip sensation and drooling scores showed a strong positive correlation (r = 0.8504). All patients were able to speak fluently, drink fluid without leakage, and blow a balloon easily. All patients and observers were satisfied with the lip cosmetics, with no significant difference between satisfaction scores (P = 0.087615).There was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.00001) between mean sensation scores of surrounding healthy lip (2.94 ± 0.27) and free flaps (4.15 ± 0.4). All the donor scars healed uneventfully.

An Interdisciplinary, Comprehensive Recovery Pathway Improves Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction Delivery.

INTRODUCTION: Free-flap (autologous) breast reconstruction demonstrates superiority over alloplastic approaches but is offered infrequently. Enhanced recovery protocols can address postoperative challenges, but most literature is limited to inpatient interventions and outcomes. This study describes an adoptable, longitudinally comprehensive and multidisciplinary recovery pathway for autologous reconstruction which adds to the current guidelines. The authors aimed to allow perioperative outcomes comparable to alloplastic reconstructions. METHODS: All autologous Comprehensive Recovery Pathway (CRP) subjects from a single surgeon were retrospectively included. A comparator group of equal size was randomly selected from institutional subpectoral and dual-plane tissue expander patients having Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guideline-directed care. All subjects in both cohorts received preoperative paravertebral regional blocks. Operative detail, inpatient recovery, longitudinal morphine equivalents (MEs) required, and complications were compared. RESULTS: Each cohort included 71 cases (99 breasts). Despite longer operations, intraoperative MEs were fewer in autologous cases ( P = 0.02). Morphine equivalents during inpatient stay were similar between cohorts, with both being discharged on median day 2. Multivariate regression demonstrated a 0.8-day increased stay for autologous subjects with additional contribution from bilateral cases, body mass index, and age ( P < 0.05). Autologous subjects were regularly discharged postoperative day 1 (17%) and postoperative day 2 (39%), with trend toward earlier discharge ( P < 0.01). Outpatient MEs were significantly fewer in autologous subjects, corresponding to a 30- to 150-mg oxycodone difference ( P < 0.01). Major complication occurred in 12.7% of autologous and 22.5% of alloplastic subjects ( P = 0.11). Flap loss occurred in 1 autologous subject versus 11 alloplastic failures ( P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study details partnership between the plastic surgery service, regional and acute pain anesthesia services, and dedicated nursing with longitudinal optimizations allowing perioperative outcomes improved over current literature. Patients in the CRP used fewer opioids from operation through follow-up with comparable length of stay and significantly fewer reconstructive failures than alloplastic subjects. The pathway may be quickly adopted into academic practice patterns and mitigates traditional barriers, allowing extension of autologous reconstruction offerings.

Technical refinements of the scapular tip-free flap for mandibular reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: The use of scapular tip chimeric free flaps (STFFs) for reconstructing mandibular defects has recently become popular, but its utility relative to other bone-containing free flaps remains debatable. The aim of the report is to describe how technical modification of STFF impacted in its use for mandibular reconstruction also commenting results obtained in a unicentric series of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing mandibular reconstruction using an STFF from January 1, 2014 to June 1, 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in this report. We collected data on chimeric flap type, bone management, vascular pedicles, and the final outcomes. In total, 31 patients (13 men and 18 women) with a mean age of 68 years were enrolled. According to the classification system of Urken, 15 patients had body defects, while 7 had ramus defects, another 7 had symphysis defects, and 2 had both ramus and bodily defects. STFF was always harvested working in two equips simultaneously, in supine position. Dissection included preparation of chimeric components of the flap as latissimus dorsi, serratus and scapular tip. After pedicle dissection scapular bone was cut basing on reconstructive needing with a rectangular (stick) shape including the border of the scapula. In cases of longer bone harvesting, circumflex pedicle was also included to perfuse the upper portion of the scapular border. In five cases, the STFF was harvested with only the scapular angle component, and was thus a composite osteomuscular flap; for the remaining 26 cases, a chimeric STFF was used. Circumflex pedicle was included for eight patients. Six of the seven patients with symphyseal defects underwent a single osteotomy. RESULTS: The average length of the harvested was 69.92 mm (maximum length = 104 mm). The average height of transplanted bone was 26.78 mm (maximum height = 44.2 mm). Mouth-opening was normal in 25 patients, limited in 6 patients, and severely impaired in no patients. The cosmetic results were rated as excellent by 20 patients, good by 8 patients, and poor by 3 patients. CONCLUSION: The STFF is an excellent option for mandibular reconstruction when other flaps are not available and for patients in poor general condition. Technical innovations here presented made possible to harvest long bone segments with accurate shape thanks to osteotomies if needed and with adequate soft tissues components of the chimeric flap, ensuring satisfactory functional and cosmetic results.

Use of scapular tip flaps in the reconstruction of head and neck defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Scapular tip flaps (STF) may be used as an alternative to traditional methods of reconstruction of head and neck cancer (HNC) defects. This study aimed to establish the success and complication rates for STF in HNC reconstruction. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, BMJ Journals, DARE, EMBASE databases and Cochrane (CENTRAL) register. (Registry CRD42023428012). A total of 23 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria with 474 patients who underwent reconstructive procedures using the STF. 100% of STF used were free flaps (STFFs). The most common reason for reconstruction was following malignancy (81.4%, n = 386). The pooled success rates in all studies using scapular tip flaps in head and neck reconstruction was 99% (95% CI, 97 to 100, p = 1.00; I2 = 0). Pooled total complication rates were 38% (95% CI, 25 to 51, p < 0.01; I2 = 90%). 19.6% required return to theatre with only 1.5% being for repeat flap coverage. The STF demonstrated an overall success rate of 99%. This is higher than other documented success rates with mainstay flaps for HNC defect reconstruction. Complication and re-operation rates were also like recorded rates. This review demonstrates the advantage of STF as a safe and versatile reconstructive option for HNC related defects. Evaluation of the literature is limited by poor-quality studies and comparability bias.

Optimising oral cancer reconstruction: a retrospective cohort study on the modified radial forearm free flap technique to eliminate the need for a secondary donor site.

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is commonly used in the reconstruction of oral cancer patients. Traditional RFFF (TRFFF) techniques, which often require a secondary donor site to repair the forearm defect, may result in a scar extending to the dorsal hand. This can lead to significant functional and aesthetic concerns in the forearm. We designed a modified RFFF (MRFFF) that incorporates a glasses-shaped flap and features deep venous drainage. To evaluate its effectiveness we conducted a retrospective chart review of 105 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma who underwent reconstructive surgery between 2018 and 2022. These patients were treated either with a TRFFF (n = 60) or the newly developed MRFFF (n = 45). Our inclusion criteria, guided by preliminary surgical experience prior to initiating the study, stipulated that single oral defects should be no larger than 6 × 6 cm2, and adjacent double defects no larger than 3 × 6 cm2. Flap size, pedicle length, harvesting duration, and anastomosis during the surgical procedure were compared between the two techniques. Preoperative and postoperative oral function, recurrence, mortality, and dorsal scarring were recorded. One-week, one-month, and six-month postoperative subjective aesthetics assessments, and self-reported postoperative donor hand function, were measured using the Michigan hand questionnaire (MHQ). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of flap size, pedicle length, harvesting time, anastomosis time, postoperative oral function, recurrence, and mortality. However, patients with a MRFFF did not require a second donor graft site and did not have scars extending to the dorsal forearm. They also had significantly improved postoperative aesthetic outcomes (1 week: 70.6%, 1 month: 62.2%) and donor hand function (1 week: 54.6%, 1 month: 40.4%) compared with the TRFFF group (p < 0.001). The MRFFF eliminates the need for secondary donor sites and improves primary donor site outcomes. It is versatile and can be employed for either single or composite oral defects. Through extensive case studies, we have defined its specific scope: it is suitable for single defects measuring no more than 6 × 6 cm2, or for composite defects no larger than 3 × 6 cm2. Furthermore, it does not compromise the functional recovery of the recipient site, and should be widely adopted for all qualifying patients.

Outcomes and influencing factors of dental implants in fibula, iliac crest, and scapula free flaps: a retrospective case-control study.

PURPOSE: Reconstruction with vascularized bone grafts after ablative surgery and subsequent dental rehabilitation with implants is often challenging; however, it helps improve the patient's quality of life. This retrospective case-control study aimed to determine the implant survival/success rates in different vascularized bone grafts and potential risk factors. METHODS: Only patients who received implants in free vascularized bone grafts between 2012 and 2020 were included. The free flap donor sites were the fibula, iliac crest, and scapula. The prosthetic restoration had to be completed, and the observation period had to be over one year after implantation. Implant success was defined according to the Health Scale for Dental Implants criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients with 227 implants were included. The implant survival rate was 86.3% after an average of 48.7 months. The causes of implant loss were peri-implantitis (n = 24), insufficient osseointegration (n = 1), removal due to tumor recurrence (n = 1), and osteoradionecrosis (n = 5). Of all implants, 52.4% were classified as successful, 19.8% as compromised, and 27.8% as failed. Removal of osteosynthesis material prior to or concurrent with implant placement resulted in significantly better implant success than material not removed (p = 0.035). Localization of the graft in the mandibular region was associated with a significantly better implant survival (p = 0.034) and success (p = 0.002), also a higher Karnofsky Performance Status Scale score with better implant survival (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Implants placed in vascularized grafts showed acceptable survival rates despite the potential risk factors often present in these patient groups. However, peri-implantitis remains a challenge.

Reconstruction of plantar foot defects with free super-thin anterolateral thigh flap.

BACKGROUNDS: In the repair of plantar foot defects, it is important that the reconstructed area is compatible with surrounding tissue while weight-bearing ability continues. In our study, we present long-term results of plantar foot reconstruction with super-thin ALT flaps in patients that required reconstruction with free tissue transfer. METHODS: We evaluated 11 patients with plantar foot defects that underwent reconstruction with a super-thin ALT flap. Patients were evaluated for postoperative ulceration, ability to wear normal shoes, time to return to work/school, LEFS score and satisfaction with aesthetic results. RESULTS: No bone defects were observed in the patients included in our study, except for the phalanges and distal metatarsals. Defects with soft tissue loss were reconstructed. The mean flap thickness was 4.9 mm (range 3-6 mm). Follow-up period ranged from 16 to 59 months. One patient required grafting for partial flap necrosis and recovered totally. Another patient required debulking surgery. Two patients had superficial ulceration postoperatively, which responded well to conservative therapy. The mean VAS score for cosmetic satisfaction was 8 of 10 (range, 6-9). Eight patients were satisfied with the flap contour, while three others were fairly satisfied. Mean time to return to work/school after surgery was 2.5 months. The preoperative LEFS score increased from 32.03 ± 15.2 to 58.7 ± 10.6 in the postoperative period, this difference was statistically significant (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: We consider that the advantageous features of super-thin ALT flaps such as proper tightening, reduced postoperative atrophy, and better contouring features make these flaps suitable for plantar foot defects.

Early outcomes of osteofascial versus osteocutaneous fibula free flap mandibular reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: This study compares early outcomes of osteofascial fibula free flap (OF-FFF) with donor-site primary closure and osteocutaneous (OC) FFF with donor-site skin grafting in segmental mandibular reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of FFF mandibular reconstruction patients (2006-2022) divided into OF-FFF and OC-FFF groups. Clinical data, operative parameters, and early postoperative outcomes (≤ 90 days) were analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 67 patients (39 OF-FFF, 28 OC-FFF). OF-FFF had significantly lower donor-site complications (12.8% vs. 53.6%, p < 0.001) and revision surgeries (7.7% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.004) compared to OC-FFF. Recipient-site (28.2% vs. 25%, p = 0.77) and flap (15.4% vs. 17.9%, p > 0.99) complications were comparable. CONCLUSIONS: OF-FFF mandibular reconstruction with donor-site primary closure is a safe and reliable technique associated with superior donor-site and comparable flap and recipient-site outcomes to OC-FFF, thus may be considered as a viable alternative to OC-FFF for selected patients.

Identifying risk factors and analyzing reconstructive outcomes in patients with lower-extremity soft-tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Reconstructing defects after resecting soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) can be challenging. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the reconstructive outcomes and identify the potential risk factors in patients undergoing reconstruction after excision of lower-extremity STS. METHODS: Patients with lower-extremity STS were included. This database was compiled of patients from a single, large National Cancer Institute-accredited academic hospital. In total, 302 patients were included between January 2016 to January 2022. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for developing complications for each patient and surgical characteristic. RESULTS: The following factors were independent predictors of any complication: benign pulmonary disease (OR = 4.2; p = 0.02), preoperative radiotherapy (RT; OR = 2.5; p = 0.047), a tumor in the medial thigh (OR = 1.9; p = 0.03), body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2 (OR = 1.05; p = 0.037), and full-thickness skin graft (OR = 5.4; p = 0.01). In the preoperative RT subgroup, reconstructing a defect via undermining and layered closure alone was an independent predictor of dehiscence (OR = 2.1; p = 0.02) and seroma (OR = 3.1; p = 0.02), whereas pedicled flaps (OR = 0.08; p = 0.001) and free flaps (OR = 0.05; p = 0.001) were independent protectors against any complication. CONCLUSION: Information derived from this analysis will assist with accurate preoperative patient counseling, which is crucial for informed decision-making and expectation management in lower-extremity STS. BMI and pulmonary function should be optimized to the extent possible to reduce postoperative complications. Patients treated preoperatively with RT should be reconstructed with a pedicled or free flap to optimize recovery.

Long-Term Outcomes after Pediatric Mandibular Reconstruction Using Vascularized Free Fibula Flap.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of mandibular reconstruction with vascularized free fibula flap in pediatric patients. METHODS: Consecutive cases of mandibular reconstruction with vascularized free fibula flaps in pediatric patients at Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology between 1999 and 2019 were reviewed. Postoperative computed tomography (CT) data of all patients were collected at each postoperative follow-up point, and after the age of 18 years. The length and height of the grafted fibula and the length of the remaining mandible were evaluated by measuring the three-dimensional CT data using ProPlan CMF 3.0 software. Lower limb function was evaluated using the Enneking evaluation scale. Facial symmetry was self-evaluated and scored. Statistical analysis was performed on the data obtained. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in this study. All flaps were successful. The CT measurement results showed growth in the length of the grafted fibula that reconstructed the mandibular ramus and the residual mandible ( P < 0.05). The height of the grafted fibula remained stable ( P > 0.05). Eight patients were followed up until they were older than 18 years, and the CT measurement results after 18 years showed an essentially symmetric mandible profile ( P > 0.05). All patients were satisfied with their postoperative facial symmetry. Enneking evaluation scores showed good recovery of lower limb functions. CONCLUSIONS: The vascularized free fibula flap for mandibular reconstruction in pediatric patients is safe and reliable. It also provides good cosmetic and functional outcomes, as it demonstrated positive growth. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Comparison of the outcomes of split thickness skin graft versus thickness skin graft for closure of the radial forearm free flap donor site: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Radial forearm free flap (RFFF) donor site closure is traditionally performed with split thickness skin grafts (STSG), which can be associated with poor aesthetics, wrist stiffness, paresthesia, reduced strength, and tendon exposure. Full thickness skin grafts (FTSG) are potentially beneficial as they provide a more durable coverage, and the skin graft donor site can be closed primarily, which is more aesthetic. The aim of this systematic review is to compare the outcomes of STSG versus FTSG for closure of the RFFF donor site. METHODS: A systematic review was performed, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. The primary objective was to answer: do subjects undergoing RFFF harvest, utilizing FTSG to close the RFFF donor site, compared to STSG, achieve superior aesthetics at the RFFF donor site? Included papers compared FTSG and STSG with statistical data. Means were compared with t-test and proportions with Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: The initial search resulted in 1851 studies. After applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, the search resulted in eight studies, with 366 total skin grafts, 197 STSG and 169 FTSG. Six studies evaluated aesthetics utilizing a Likert scale, with the scaled average aesthetic score for FTSG being 7.9/10 compared to 6.9/10 for STSG (p < .001). Tendon exposure was measured in five studies, with a rate of 13.1% for STSG versus 10.6% for FTSG (p = .555). No significant difference in function was observed, however, methods to quantify function were heterogeneous. CONCLUSION: FTSG compared to STSG, resulted in statistically significant improved aesthetics, with comparable rates of tendon exposure and function.

Biomechanical and aesthetic outcomes following radial forearm free flap transfer: comparison of ipsilateral full-thickness skin graft and traditional split-thickness skin graft.

The radial forearm free flap (RFFF) is associated with donor site morbidity. This study aimed to quantify the functional and aesthetic outcomes after closure of the RFFF donor site using triangular full-thickness skin grafts (FTSGs) harvested adjacent to the flap or traditional split-thickness skin grafts (STSGs). The study included patients who underwent oral cavity reconstruction with an RFFF between March 2017 and August 2021. The patients were divided into two groups based on the donor site closure method: FTSG or STSG. The primary outcomes were biomechanical grip strength, pinch strength, and range of wrist movements. Subjective donor site morbidity, aesthetic and functional results were also analysed. The study included 75 patients (FTSG n = 35; STSG n = 40). Postoperatively, there was a statistically significant difference in grip strength (P = 0.049) and wrist extension (P = 0.047) between the FTSG and STSG groups, in favour of the STSG. Differences between the groups in pinch strength and other wrist motions were not statistically significant. The harvesting time was significantly shorter for the FTSG (P = 0.041) and the appearance of the donor site was better (P = 0.026) when compared to the STSG. Cold intolerance was more frequent in the STSG group (32.5% STSG vs 6.7% FTSG; P = 0.017). Subjective function, numbness, pain, hypertrophic scar, itching, and social stigma did not differ significantly between the groups. Compared with the STSG, the FTSG showed better cosmesis and avoided additional donor sites, with clinically negligible differences in hand biomechanics.